From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Sat Apr 21 05:50:17 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 21 Apr 2001 12:50:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 11163 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2001 12:50:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Apr 2001 12:50:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hk.egroups.com) (10.1.10.43) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2001 12:50:16 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.10.108] by hk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 21 Apr 2001 12:50:15 -0000
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 12:50:12 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Three more issues
Message-ID: <9brvm4+ie44@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F2314omRXf2LTrpwACk00005c77@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 671
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

--- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:
> 
> la Avital cusku di'e
> 
> >I don't seem to understand. Why aren't several words cu valsi?
> 
> Could you ask the question in Lojban please?
> Each of several words certainly is valsi:
> {le so'o valsi cu valsi}. A group of words, however,
> is not a word: {lei so'o valsi cu valsi so'omei gi'enai valsi}

{le so'o valsi cu valsi}.
Am I wrong stating that this distinction (le/lei) doesn't really work?
{le so'o valsi} means: *all* of the several discribed as words, not *each*, so it's plural too. (ro le su'o -> ro le so'o). Hence: {le 
so'o valsi cu ca'a valsi so'omei gi'enai - pa - valsi}

.aulun.