Subject: Re: Three more issues

From: "A.W.T." <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 12:50:12 -0000

--- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:
> 
> la Avital cusku di'e
> 
> >I don't seem to understand. Why aren't several words cu valsi?
> 
> Could you ask the question in Lojban please?
> Each of several words certainly is valsi:
> {le so'o valsi cu valsi}. A group of words, however,
> is not a word: {lei so'o valsi cu valsi so'omei gi'enai valsi}

{le so'o valsi cu valsi}.
Am I wrong stating that this distinction (le/lei) doesn't really work?
{le so'o valsi} means: *all* of the several discribed as words, not *each*, so it's plural too. (ro le su'o -> ro le so'o). Hence: {le 
so'o valsi cu ca'a valsi so'omei gi'enai - pa - valsi}

.aulun.