From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Sat Apr 21 15:23:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 21 Apr 2001 22:23:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 88537 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2001 22:23:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Apr 2001 22:23:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta3 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2001 22:23:44 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f3LMNhZ25880 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:23:43 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:23:43 -0600 (MDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] fanvyca'a In-Reply-To: <20010421175812.A695@twcny.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Jay Kominek On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Rob Speer wrote: > I propose this lujvo instead: > selplafanva:se+platu+fanva:plan-translate; compile:$fanva1 $platu2 $=fanva2 $fanva3 $fanva4 > x1 compiles source code x2 from language x3 to language x4 That looks much better. I hope LLG will replace the previous lujvo with this one. Getting rid of the used by place is a very good idea. After all, pi'o can provide it. (Or le selplafanva can be the x2 of a pilno bridi.) > (Hmm. Can binary code be considered a language?) Sure, it is, after all, simply a less human-convinent form of assembly. Does anyone happen to have a pile of technical lujvo they're sitting on? The terms which are available at the moment are so scant as to be nearly worthless. (I started coming up with some, but then I accidently deleted it. :/ ) - Jay Kominek Did you poison the coffee? No more than usual.