From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Apr 21 18:14:49 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 22 Apr 2001 01:14:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 37455 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2001 01:14:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Apr 2001 01:14:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.31) by mta2 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2001 01:14:48 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 18:14:48 -0700
Received: from 200.41.210.29 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Sun, 22 Apr 2001 01:14:47 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.29]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] sumti raising
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 01:14:47 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F319RKLpgTFur2iz2Mb00009405@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2001 01:14:48.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[9FA28780:01C0CAC9]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la adam cusku di'e

>Why is it that "tcica", "bapli" (among many others, probably) have an
>event in the x1 place? Doesn't deception/coercion logically require a
>deceiver/coercer, or is there some other meaning of these words that
>doesn't require an actor?

i le nu smaji cu tcica mi le nu jinvi le zdani cu kunti
i no da gasnu

co'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


