From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Apr 24 06:13:54 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 24 Apr 2001 13:13:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 51140 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2001 13:13:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 Apr 2001 13:13:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2001 13:13:52 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:55:44 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:15:29 +0100
Message-Id: <sae58a81.067@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:14:45 +0100
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] la lojban la and bangu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>

Jorge:
> la and cusku di'e
>
> >It may contain grammatical errors that I'm not aware of,
>
> No, the gramar was perfectly ok.
>
> >but AFAICS, points for possible confusion are the lujvo
> >"lojbau" =3D 'x1 speaks Lojban'
>
> That indeed was confusing, because it means
> "x1 is a logical language used by x2". It seemed a bit
> strange that you wanted to engage in the activity of being
> a logical language... :) Maybe you meant {jboba'u}.

Oh of course. Even I know these rafsi, loth tho I am to learn
any. Indeed I originally had jbobau, but baulked at the
initial cluster and went for what I carelessly mistook for
an allomorph. I really should have stuck to my guns &
used zei. Is ba'u also a rafsi for bangu? If so then I did mean
jboba'u; otherwise I meant jbobau.

--And.


