From phma@oltronics.net Thu Apr 26 12:37:50 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 26 Apr 2001 19:37:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 12472 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2001 19:37:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Apr 2001 19:37:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.44) by mta3 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2001 19:37:48 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id EB1F93C567; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] djataurte
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:26:43 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <01042523234609.02780@neofelis> <4.3.2.7.2.20010426021004.00c31d90@127.0.0.1> <20010426095910.U8953@digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010426095910.U8953@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0104261429450C.01394@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
>As someone who knows very little about fu'ivla formation:
>
>Is djataurte legal as it stands or not? If not, what do we do with it?
>It's supposed to refer to the food, btw.

It is a valid fu'ivla but will be taken as type 4 because it doesn't follow the
type 3 rule. By the rule it would be "cidjrtarte".

phma

