From araizen@newmail.net Sat Apr 28 18:00:33 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 29 Apr 2001 01:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 33790 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2001 01:00:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2001 01:00:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ch.egroups.com) (10.1.10.51) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 01:00:33 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net Received: from [10.1.10.100] by ch.egroups.com with NNFMP; 29 Apr 2001 01:00:33 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 01:00:31 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Three more issues Message-ID: <9cfp3f+2kt9@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 541 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.0.181.117 From: "Adam Raizen" la xorxes cusku di'e > >Again, I suspect that Adam's point is, in effect, that > >"pi ro loi rectu cu kukte", like "lei rectu cu kukte" is (or > >can be in the right context) true even if not all parts are > >tasty. > > I could agree with that too. You have to be a really big meat > lover to say it though. i piro loi rectu cu kukte ijotu'e piro le pa gunma be piro lo'i rectu cu kukte ija ro pagbu be piro loi rectu cu kukte to na'i su'o pagbu toi tu'u i oi cusku la'ede'u fi mi so'iroiku gi'u rectu citka nelci mutce mu'o mi'e adam