From graywyvern@hotmail.com Mon Apr 30 14:51:28 2001
Return-Path: <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 30 Apr 2001 21:51:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 58430 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 21:51:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Apr 2001 21:51:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.196) by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 21:51:27 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:51:26 -0700
Received: from 209.176.48.26 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:51:26 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [209.176.48.26]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] lujvo place structures
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:51:26 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F1962beJxkqPRL21Dcz0001244d@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2001 21:51:26.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4BFA0B0:01C0D1BF]
From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>

>From: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group <lojbab@lojban.org>
li'o
>Such a program would take the tanru
>for any lujvo and generate the place structure that lujvo would have if no
>places were combined or deleted, using the standard codes and conventions
>for labelling the places.

except that wouldn't someone still have to decide from the
semantic content, whether the JE-lujvo or the BE-lujvo
conventions should be followed?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


