From lojbab@lojban.org Mon Apr 30 15:50:38 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 30 Apr 2001 22:50:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 20794 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 22:50:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2001 22:50:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-5.cais.net) (205.252.14.75) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 22:50:36 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (209-8-89-145.dial-up.cais.com [209.8.89.145] (may be forged)) by stmpy-5.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3UMoYM94676 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010430184529.00c66240@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:53:33 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] lujvo place structures
In-Reply-To: <F1962beJxkqPRL21Dcz0001244d@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 09:51 PM 04/30/2001 +0000, michael helsem wrote:
> >From: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group <lojbab@lojban.org>
> li'o
> >Such a program would take the tanru
> >for any lujvo and generate the place structure that lujvo would have if no
> >places were combined or deleted, using the standard codes and conventions
> >for labelling the places.
>
>except that wouldn't someone still have to decide from the
>semantic content, whether the JE-lujvo or the BE-lujvo
>conventions should be followed?

Certainly. But the time-consuming lookup would be eliminated, and the 
typing in standard format made fairly rigorous (and a really sophisticated 
tool of the kind I am NOT asking for, would allow people to click on places 
to delete or combine them or reorder them according to the relevant rules - 
that might be a good LONG-TERM project that might involve significant 
playing around to find the ideal interface, but I don't want work held up 
waiting for people to concoct the ideal user interface - what I suggested 
eliminates time-consuming typing and lookup and encourages a standard format).

If there is more than one standard order for places, we obviously have to 
choose one or the other order as a default for listing all the places, 
presumably the more common one. Someone can look at the lujvo already 
defined to see what is the most common order.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


