From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue May 01 09:59:05 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 1 May 2001 16:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 82478 invoked from network); 1 May 2001 14:33:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 May 2001 14:33:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.152) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 May 2001 14:33:08 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 1 May 2001 07:33:08 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.222 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 01 May 2001 14:33:08 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.222] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] le medomoi e le memimoi e le memi'omoi Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:33:08 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2001 14:33:08.0693 (UTC) FILETIME=[A447E850:01C0D24B] From: "Jorge Llambias" la robyspir cusku di'e >Wouldn't it be more consistent with the usual way of saying 'my' and 'your' >in >Lojban to use {me lemi}, {me ledo}, etc.? But that is not grammatical. >I really can't picture ownership as a sequence. We already have {se ponse} for ownership. "Possesives" have a much wider use, I just meant a correspondence. Let's put it the other way: what does {me mi moi}, which is grammatical, mean? Doesn't it have to mean "x1 is mine" or something very similar to that? co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.