From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue May 01 13:54:23 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 1 May 2001 20:52:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 41420 invoked from network); 1 May 2001 16:55:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 May 2001 16:55:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.12) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 May 2001 16:55:44 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 1 May 2001 09:55:43 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.40 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 01 May 2001 16:55:43 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.40] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] le medomoi e le memimoi e le memi'omoi Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:55:43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2001 16:55:43.0905 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F95A910:01C0D25F] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >I do very strongly disapprove of "le du'u" and (usually) "le nu", though. >"loi du'u/nu" would be much better. Is it possible to have {re du'u broda}? If it isn't, then I don't see what difference it makes which gadri is used. I use {le} because that is what I would use with anything that is one and only one thing, but any of the others (lei/loi/lo) would serve just as well. If it is possible to have {re du'u broda} then I'd have to understand what that means before choosing a gadri, but {le} still looks like the strongest contender to me. co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.