From araizen@newmail.net Wed May 02 18:12:39 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 3 May 2001 01:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4164 invoked from network); 2 May 2001 23:16:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 May 2001 23:16:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mo.egroups.com) (10.1.1.34) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 May 2001 23:16:49 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net Received: from [10.1.10.63] by mo.egroups.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2001 23:16:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 23:16:48 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: le medomoi e le memimoi e le memi'omoi Message-ID: <9cq4h0+l6cu@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 993 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.0.182.68 From: "Adam Raizen" la xorxes cusku di'e > mi fanva di'e le lojbo le glico di'e > ... > @c `I didn't know it was YOUR table,' said Alice; `it's laid for a > @c great many more than three.' > > i lu mi na pu djuno le du'u le jubme cu me ba'e domoi sei la alis cusku > i jy bredi tu'a lo za'usaicimei li'u > ... > > @c `Which is just the case with MINE,' said the Hatter. > > i lu mi'u le me ba'e mimoi sei la mapypre cu cusku li'u > ... > > The idea is that if you sort things by people, those that correspond > to you are yours, those that correspond to me are mine, and so on. > I think it is very useful to have a way of saying "x1 is yours", > "x1 is mine", etc. Comments? > > co'o mi'e xorxes I think it solves the problem nicely. When we use "ny.moi", we are referencing objects by numbers. When we use "meko'amoi", we are referencing objects by sumti. I think it can be thought of as parallel to the difference between arrays and associative arrays in some programming languages. mu'o mi'e adam