From phma@oltronics.net Mon May 07 05:05:57 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 7 May 2001 12:05:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 8687 invoked from network); 7 May 2001 12:05:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 May 2001 12:05:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.32) by mta3 with SMTP; 7 May 2001 12:05:55 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9229E3C55D; Mon, 7 May 2001 08:04:48 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] imperatives & scope (was: RE: Predicate logic and childhood.)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 08:02:18 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <E14wj8g-0003ph-00@mercury.ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <E14wj8g-0003ph-00@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0105070804470C.24005@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Mon, 07 May 2001, John Cowan wrote:
li'o
>Indeed, I am about to get a new telephone number at work. What's wrong
>with my saying to the telephone installer "Make a note of my telephone
>number", even though it will not truly be mine until he assigns it to me?
>It strikes me as an entirely reasonable and perspicuous thing to say.

To be precise, you could say {ko rejgau fi le mi ba fonjudri}.

phma

