From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed May 16 11:07:11 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 16 May 2001 18:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 62060 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 18:06:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 May 2001 18:06:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 May 2001 18:06:34 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA05427; Wed, 16 May 2001 14:09:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B02C12F.3050204@reutershealth.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:04:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010505 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: b.gohla@gmx.de, lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Back to the GNOME stuff References: <20010514212131.A1503@twcny.rr.com> <20010515093541.A19864@laranja.org> <20010515170625.C700@twcny.rr.com> <01051619152300.00897@linux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: John Cowan Björn Gohla wrote: > i came across this kind of problem working on the level0 package. > taking into account the ISO 639 standard the an appropriate lang code for > lojban would be "x-loj". > the "x-" is for unofficial codes, and the considering the that the standard > also allows three letter codes "loj" is preferreable for verbosity. I'm going to request IETF registration for "i-lojban". I'm on the mailing list, the reviewer is a buddy of mine, he's a conlanger, and i-klingon is already registered. Should take 2 weeks. So please go ahead and use i-lojban: nobody else will want it! -- There is / one art || John Cowan no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein