Subject: Re: [lojban] Back to the GNOME stuff

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:04:31 -0400

Björn Gohla wrote:

> i came across this kind of problem working on the level0 package.
> taking into account the ISO 639 standard the an appropriate lang code for 
> lojban would be "x-loj".
> the "x-" is for unofficial codes, and the considering the that the standard 
> also allows three letter codes "loj" is preferreable for verbosity.

I'm going to request IETF registration for "i-lojban". I'm on the
mailing list, the reviewer is a buddy of mine, he's a conlanger,
and i-klingon is already registered. Should take 2 weeks.

So please go ahead and use i-lojban: nobody else will want it!

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein