Subject: Re: [lojban] Back to the GNOME stuff

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:17:28 -0400

Please ignore my earlier message!

Björn Gohla wrote:

> i came across this kind of problem working on the level0 package.
> taking into account the ISO 639 standard the an appropriate lang code for 
> lojban would be "x-loj".
> the "x-" is for unofficial codes, and the considering the that the standard 
> also allows three letter codes "loj" is preferreable for verbosity.

I am requesting IETF registration of the code "art-lojban" ("art" is
the ISO 639-2 code for artificial languages generally). This should
take about two weeks, as I expect it to sail through.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein