From rob@twcny.rr.com Wed May 16 14:09:13 2001
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 16 May 2001 21:09:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 33608 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 21:07:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 May 2001 21:07:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.146) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 May 2001 21:07:16 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with ESMTP id f4GL5L027229 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 16 May 2001 17:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from riff ([24.95.175.101]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 16 May 2001 17:05:21 -0400
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1508T7-0000H8-00 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 16 May 2001 17:04:29 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:04:29 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Back to the GNOME stuff
Message-ID: <20010516170429.A555@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105160318130.22055-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org> <p04320403b7287dc563d2@[192.168.0.2]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
In-Reply-To: <p04320403b7287dc563d2@[192.168.0.2]>; from edward.cherlin.sy.67@aya.yale.edu on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:21:52PM -0700
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:21:52PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> That's exactly what I was suggesting. The proposed definition 
> overspecifies "source code" by assuming that it is to be compiled to 
> machine language. I think "program text" is better suited to be the 
> defining metaphor.

I didn't make a lujvo for "source code", I made one for "compiler". So the
"source code" place in that lujvo only refers to source code to be compiled.

There is already a lujvo for "source code" which is {samselpla}, which should
be general enough for your demands.
-- 
Rob Speer


