From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Wed May 16 23:20:12 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 17 May 2001 06:20:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 34997 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 06:19:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 May 2001 06:19:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hm.egroups.com) (10.1.10.45) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 May 2001 06:19:37 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.2.101] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2001 06:19:37 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 06:19:35 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Parsing
Message-ID: <9dvqhn+3a0d@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010516234328.B110@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 814
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 62.104.218.70
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

> > 
--- In lojban@y..., Richard Curnow <richard@r...> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 06:24:09AM -0000, A.W.T. wrote:

> {bau la lojban tavla do} is not a bridi tail. The grouping of 2) is
> like this
> 
> ((mi) (bau la lojban)) (tavla do)
> term term selbri tail-term
> terms bridi-tail
> 
> so (bau la lojban) is part of the 'terms', before the bridi-tail has
> even begun. For 1), 2) and 3), the bridi-tail is respectively
> 
> 1) tavla do bau la lojban.
> 2) tavla do
> 3) tavla
> 
> > Is there a rule explicitely stating in the Book that only bridi-tails *starting with a selbri* are allowed after {gi'e}?
> > 
> 
> Pretty much. You might get "ke", "bo", "ge" or
> simple-tense-modal+"gi"/"ke"/"bo" between gi'e and the selbri.

je'e .i ckire

co'o mi'e .aulun.