Subject: Re: [lojban] djan. melbi vecnu

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 15:16:18 -0400

[email-masked] wrote:

> I suppose it is grammatical, but it is bad form: preneces should have
> follow-up: {ny} or {fi ny} in the brivla proper (cf. earlier rants about
> missing sumti)

Not at all. The "zo'u" construct can be either a logical prenex
or a topic in a topic-comment sentence.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein