Subject: Re: [lojban] udhr

From: Björn Gohla <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:43:05 +0200

On Sunday 20 May 2001 19:16, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> la biorn cusku di'e
> >pamoi le tonselsku
> ton- torni "twist"??
has to be torselsku
> >lo ro remna cu zifre .ei
>
> That's "at least one of all human beings should be free".
> You want {ro remna} or {ro lo remna}.
>
> The declaration seems to be a statement about how things are,
> not how they should be, so I wouldn't use {ei} there. Also,
> the "born" part is missing. Maybe:
i thought about that, but one can not deny that the declaration has a 
normative aspect, it does not concede any choice whether this proposition is 
valid. how could this be expressed?

> {ro remna cu se jinzi le ka zifre gi'e dunli fi le ka selsinma
> e le selflalu}
>
> >.i lo go'i cu dunli .ei vo'a le ka selsinma ku .e lo
> >selflalu
>
> {lo go'i} is "some human beings" and {lo selflalu} would
> be "some rights"

pamoi le torselsku

ro remna cu se jinzi le ka zifre .i le go'i cu dunli vo'a le ka selsinma ku 
.e le selflalu .i le go'i cu pensi gi'e ckaji le ka marde .i le go'i cu jikca
seku'u le su'u tunba

ce'e
- -- 
- --------------------
"all you base belong to me!"
pub 1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger) 
<[email-masked]>
Key fingerprint = 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5 8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub 1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07