From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 24 11:18:08 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 24 May 2001 18:18:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 27388 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 18:18:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 May 2001 18:18:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta1 with SMTP; 24 May 2001 18:18:05 -0000
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152zgO-0002jt-00 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 24 May 2001 11:18:00 -0700
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:18:00 -0700
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lessons
Message-ID: <20010524111800.T17618@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <11.14c05c46.283e2156@aol.com> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105241413300.16368-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105241413300.16368-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>; from xod@sixgirls.org on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:15:26PM -0400
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:15:26PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > In a message dated 5/23/2001 8:03:49 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > nicholas@uci.edu writes:
> >
> >
> > > My current thinking, btw, is that forethought
> > > connectives are not worth mentioning in an introductory course, as they
> > > are too infrequently used.
> > >
> > But they are so tidy and clear as opposed to the infix ("now negate the
> > sentence you just received") and so natural for "if"
> 
> 
> Nick, I hope you're teaching the newbies to use "va'o" for what they think
> "if, then" is, instead of "ganai, gi" or whatever the misleading
> formal-logic conditional is.

You might recall that not all of us agree that the formal-logic
conditional is misleading.

Those of you who felt that it was never seemed to be able to come up
with a clearer argument then, "Well, it just is. So there.".

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/

