From xod@sixgirls.org Thu May 24 11:44:12 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 24 May 2001 18:44:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 14902 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 18:43:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 May 2001 18:43:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 May 2001 18:43:15 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4OIhDT16976; Thu, 24 May 2001 14:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Cc: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lessons
In-Reply-To: <20010524111800.T17618@digitalkingdom.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105241442020.16947-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Thu, 24 May 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:15:26PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 5/23/2001 8:03:49 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > > nicholas@uci.edu writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > My current thinking, btw, is that forethought
> > > > connectives are not worth mentioning in an introductory course, as they
> > > > are too infrequently used.
> > > >
> > > But they are so tidy and clear as opposed to the infix ("now negate the
> > > sentence you just received") and so natural for "if"
> >
> >
> > Nick, I hope you're teaching the newbies to use "va'o" for what they think
> > "if, then" is, instead of "ganai, gi" or whatever the misleading
> > formal-logic conditional is.
>
> You might recall that not all of us agree that the formal-logic
> conditional is misleading.
>
> Those of you who felt that it was never seemed to be able to come up
> with a clearer argument then, "Well, it just is. So there.".



No! I had no idea anybody was yet unconvinced! Please, go back and search
for "subjunctive" in the archives, and get convinced. There are very clear
arguments in there.





-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!


