From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri May 25 19:43:29 2001
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 26 May 2001 02:43:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 9744 invoked from network); 26 May 2001 02:43:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 26 May 2001 02:43:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.118) by mta3 with SMTP; 26 May 2001 02:43:28 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with ESMTP id f4Q2flA25139 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 25 May 2001 22:41:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from riff ([24.95.175.101]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 25 May 2001 22:41:47 -0400
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 153U0M-0000oi-00 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 25 May 2001 22:40:38 -0400
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 22:40:38 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: loi (was Re: [lojban] Rosetta Project Genesis translation)
Message-ID: <20010525224038.A3056@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
References: <8.14e9300b.284062c2@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
In-Reply-To: <8.14e9300b.284062c2@aol.com>; from pycyn@aol.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:37:06PM -0400
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:37:06PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> The sentence is at least three ways ambiguous: Each C drinks more than each 
> NY, 
> the typical C drinks more than the typical NY (and that could be two, 
> depending on which of the two readings of {le'e} you go with), or the Cs 
> altogether drink moe than the NY altogether. The last is {loi}.

I thought an important part of {loi} was that it refers to part of the mass,
not the whole thing. Wouldn't that be {lei}?
--
la rab.spir

