From rob@twcny.rr.com Mon May 28 12:03:39 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 28 May 2001 19:03:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 10780 invoked from network); 28 May 2001 19:03:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 May 2001 19:03:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.146) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 May 2001 19:03:38 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with ESMTP id f4SJ21019464 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:02:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.95.175.101]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:02:00 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 154SG4-0002cx-00 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:00:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 15:00:52 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] META: Multiple postings complaint Message-ID: <20010528150052.B10074@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: ; from xod@sixgirls.org on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:29:37PM -0400 X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:29:37PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > It is bad enough that many of you, when responding to a post from > listmember X, send your response to both the list AND listmember X. Now > this has degenerated to the point of sending one copy to listmember X, one > copy to the list aliased as "lojban@onelist", and another copy to the list > aliased as "lojban@yahoogroups". Does anybody need 3 copies of a message? > I know I don't need two. Please, spend the extra 2 seconds of labor and > just check where your message is going (and how many times!). With > the way this Lojban list is set up, you cannot blindly hit reply > without changing the headers actively. You get rediculous results if > you do. Thank you! I think that part of the problem is that replies on this list default to being sent to the single listmember. Other lists on yahoogroups managed to set it up so that the "Reply-To:" pointed to the list. Why is that not the case here? -- Rob Speer