From lex@cc.gatech.edu Mon May 28 14:27:40 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lex@cc.gatech.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 28 May 2001 21:27:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 60246 invoked from network); 28 May 2001 21:27:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 May 2001 21:27:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chaos.resnet.gatech.edu) (128.61.50.168) by mta3 with SMTP; 28 May 2001 21:27:39 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=aSqueakSystem ident=lex) by chaos.resnet.gatech.edu with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 154UY6-0000kc-00 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:27:17 -0400 X-Mailer: Celeste 2.0.4081 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:27:08 -0500 References: <20010528150052.B10074@twcny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] META: Multiple postings complaint To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-Id: From: "Lex Spoon" > I think that part of the problem is that replies on this list default to being > sent to the single listmember. Other lists on yahoogroups managed to set it up > so that the "Reply-To:" pointed to the list. Why is that not the case here? In short, that solution is worse than the problem: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Much better is the "mailing-list" header which is already there; a good mail program will already have "followup to list" in addition to "reply". Really, the current situation isn't that bad. Let's not make it worse. Lex