From cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com Wed May 30 14:02:32 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 30 May 2001 21:02:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 88872 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 21:01:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 May 2001 21:01:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.12) by mta3 with SMTP; 30 May 2001 21:01:44 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504) id DD5783C55D; Wed, 30 May 2001 16:56:09 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Request for grammar clarifications Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:53:58 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01053016560701.18165@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 de'i Wed, 30 May 2001 la pycyn cusku di'e > I doubt it. Every use of {me} seems to have a more natural expressions using > {du}, possibly with {pa} if there is some doubt about quantity. What about "me me'o pi'ebu" ("is a colon")? How would you say that with "du"? cmeclax -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7FV5oBETrxUjAxlERArQnAJ9nNxsPIlbUi7aJs0MYs4OOAOGnrgCglIT5 D0iKInz8APDZEFSMxgVN0ic= =IlU7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----