From araizen@newmail.net Thu May 31 14:32:31 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 31 May 2001 21:32:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 87050 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 21:23:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 May 2001 21:23:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO c9.egroups.com) (10.1.2.66) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 May 2001 21:23:17 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net Received: from [10.1.10.113] by c9.egroups.com with NNFMP; 31 May 2001 21:21:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:21:18 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Request for grammar clarifications Message-ID: <9f6cke+lgl5@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 229 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 12.81.164.206 From: "Adam Raizen" la nitcion cusku di'e > {lo ninmu du la djiotis.} "lo ninmu cu du la djiotis". We seem to treat "du" specially. For example "lo du be ko'a" sounds a bit weird, and du is almost never used in tanru and lujvo. mu'o mi'e adam