From pycyn@aol.com Thu May 31 16:40:12 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 31 May 2001 23:40:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 52840 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 23:40:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 May 2001 23:40:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m04.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.7) by mta2 with SMTP; 31 May 2001 23:40:11 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id r.20.173ca4e8 (3938) for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20.173ca4e8.28483056@aol.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 19:40:06 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Allah To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_20.173ca4e8.28483056_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_20.173ca4e8.28483056_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/31/2001 12:40:15 PM Central Daylight Time, graywyvern@hotmail.com writes: > zasti cevni co muslo po'o .i > > muslo falo zasti cevni .i > > drata naje muslo zatcei .i > > da poi zatcei zo'u da la musycei du > Nah! Allah is (almost by definition) NOT a Muslim Allah is submitted to, not submitting "[something -- anything?] is an existing god just in case a Muslim only in some way.(I'm not sure what the {po'o} does here, if anything) existing gods are Muslims [something?] is not other and a muslim existing god of something which is an existing god, it is identical to MuslimGod" As usual, leaving out sumti makes this pretty unintelligible, but the first is compatible with there being many gods -- in fact insists on it, given the number of things muslim in some way, the second with that and with there being none (assuming lo allows empty sets), the third with (depending on the sumti) either or both of the above, the last to there being several gods, though only one called MuslimGod (I think -- can {la} sumti be plural?) note, with regard to my latest offer, that {roda cevni gi'o me la ala'ax} is compatible with polytheism -- each god a different referent of {la ala'ax}. --part1_20.173ca4e8.28483056_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/31/2001 12:40:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
graywyvern@hotmail.com writes:


zasti cevni co muslo po'o .i

muslo falo zasti cevni .i

drata naje muslo zatcei .i

da poi zatcei zo'u da la musycei du


Nah!
Allah is (almost by definition) NOT a Muslim  Allah is submitted to, not
submitting
"[something -- anything?] is an existing god just in case a Muslim only in
some way.(I'm not sure what the {po'o} does here, if anything)
existing gods are Muslims
[something?] is not other and a muslim existing god
of something which is an existing god, it is identical to MuslimGod"

As usual, leaving out sumti makes this pretty unintelligible, but the first
is compatible with there being many gods -- in fact insists on it, given the
number of things muslim in some way, the second with that and with there
being none (assuming lo allows empty sets), the third with (depending on the
sumti) either or both of the above, the last to there being several gods,
though only one called MuslimGod (I think -- can {la} sumti be plural?)

note, with regard to my latest offer, that {roda cevni gi'o me la ala'ax} is
compatible with polytheism -- each god a different referent of {la ala'ax}.

--part1_20.173ca4e8.28483056_boundary--