From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu May 31 19:18:59 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 1 Jun 2001 02:18:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6909 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 02:18:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 Jun 2001 02:18:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.37) by mta2 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 02:18:59 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:18:56 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.33 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 02:18:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.33] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] (no subject) Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 02:18:56 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2001 02:18:56.0702 (UTC) FILETIME=[360DC5E0:01C0EA41] From: "Jorge Llambias" la pycyn cusku di'e [lu'o so'i lo broda] >As noted, I would like to see those be just the massification of {so'i lo >broda}, that is, not an unspecified mass of many broda but a mass of many >unspecifed broda. I'm not sure I see when it would make a difference. Isn't a mass of many unspecified broda necessarily itself unsepcified as well? Can you construct a sentence where it would make a difference? (And BTW, {piso'i loi broda} would mean pretty much the same thing, wouldn't it? Indeed, the {lu'o} formulation may be useful as a way of clearly defining what the hell one means by {piso'i} and the like.) mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.