From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jun 06 11:14:30 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 6 Jun 2001 18:14:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 75128 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 18:14:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Jun 2001 18:14:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Jun 2001 18:14:13 -0000
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 157hoS-0004UB-00 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:13:48 -0700
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:13:48 -0700
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: Rabbity Sand-Laugher
Message-ID: <20010606111348.S7842@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <31.15cf1ef3.284da266@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <31.15cf1ef3.284da266@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 10:48:06PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> > <Of course, they should not publish their first shot until they have
> > > some reason to think they are going to do a fair job of it
> > 
> 
> Sorry to see that common courtesy has fallen to the point of being a 
> disruption (a state, yet, not even an action) to vitality. Why should you 
> ask anyone else to spend time on something you have not spent appropriate 
> time on yourself?

Ummm, pycyn, you know you're responding to yourself there, right?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/

