From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jun 06 12:22:23 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 6 Jun 2001 19:22:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 89599 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 19:22:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Jun 2001 19:22:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Jun 2001 19:22:22 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 157ish-0004sR-00 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:22:15 -0700 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:22:15 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: tanru clarification, please. Message-ID: <20010606122215.X7842@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@onelist.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Robin Lee Powell Something came up in the lojban class I'm running last night that I really wasn't sure about. We were messing with the bridi: la djan. gleki nanla to mi pu ctuca fo le cmavo be zo be seki'u le nu pu se zasti le mupli jufra po'u lu la djan. gleki be le nu klama le zarci le zdani be'o nanla li papa li'u .i .u'i clani toi So, obviously la djan. must be an x1 of nanla for the statement to be true. My question is: does he also need to be an x1 of gleki for the statement to be true, or is it just assumed by convention that sumti filling the x1 of the tertau is also filling the x1 of the seltau? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/