Subject: Re: [lojban] tanru clarification, please.

From: Robin Lee Powell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:47:23 -0700

On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 03:40:32PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 
> 
> > So, obviously la djan. must be an x1 of nanla for the statement to be
> > true.
> > 
> > My question is: does he also need to be an x1 of gleki for the statement
> > to be true, or is it just assumed by convention that sumti filling the
> > x1 of the tertau is also filling the x1 of the seltau?
> 
> 
> The official answer is that there is no official answer: tanru,
> Humptywise, mean what the speaker wants them to mean. This
> interpretation (called "parallel" in the Book) is a pretty likely
> one, but it is not inconceivable that "gleki nanla" means
> not "boy who is happy" but "boy whose age is happy".

That last sentence was deliberately unintelligable, right?

So

la djan. gleki be fa la djein. be'o nanla

is legal. I have very little idea what that would mean, though. John
is a boy who is happy like Jane?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/