From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Wed Jun 06 15:49:08 2001
Return-Path: <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 6 Jun 2001 22:49:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 4919 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 22:49:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Jun 2001 22:49:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scrabble.freeuk.net) (212.126.144.6) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Jun 2001 22:49:07 -0000
Received: from du-010-0145.freeuk.com ([212.126.153.145] helo=rrbcurnow.freeuk.com) by scrabble.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 157m6r-00069d-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 23:49:06 +0100
Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 157liZ-00008y-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:23:59 +0100
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:23:58 +0100
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] More lexing curiosities - la'i within cmene?
Message-ID: <20010606232358.B549@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <E157R4X-0002cu-00@mercury.ccil.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20010606014235.00aea130@127.0.0.1> <01060607005200.09928@neofelis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp
In-Reply-To: <01060607005200.09928@neofelis>; from phma@oltronics.net on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:37:40AM -0400
From: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>

On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:37:40AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> Correction:
> 
> Names are not permitted to have the sequences ``la'', ``lai'', ``la'i'' or
> ``doi'' embedded in them, unless the sequence is immediately preceded by a
> consonant or followed by a vowel or apostrophe.
> 

OK, I'm happy with the thread so far. This is pretty much what I
thought the rule would be.

Now for another spanner in the works. What if "la" is preceded by "y"?
e.g. does "cydoispat" break up into "cy doi spat"? I guess the answer
is not, since the latter would strictly be "cy. doi spat.", so there
would be a pause before "doi" to save us.

-- 
Richard P. Curnow, Weston-super-Mare, UK
http://www.rrbcurnow.freeuk.com/
email:richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com email:rpc@myself.com

