From cmeclax@gmx.co.uk Fri Jun 08 13:39:19 2001
Return-Path: <cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 8 Jun 2001 20:39:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 65777 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 20:39:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Jun 2001 20:39:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.40) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 20:39:14 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504) id 536383C646; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: dai was: rabbity sand-laugher
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:12:21 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <69.166a5a35.28516924@aol.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01060816142502.05188@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com
From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri <cmeclax@gmx.co.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

de'i Fri, 08 Jun 2001 la Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) cusku di'e
> If I understand you (always a big "if" since I don't do enough Lojban 
> reading), this is precisely what pycyn was complaining about that I thought 
> was NOT applicable to the discussion. Lojban attitudinals, as expressions, 
> NEVER "mean" a bridi, which is a claim. "pe'idai" is NOT a claim that the 
> other person opines something (which is what "do jinvi" means; rather it 
> says that the speaker intuits/empathizes that the other person seems to be 
> expressing the emotion marked with dai. Having used dai on an evidential, 
> we have to treat that evidential as an emotional expression (the 
> evidentials can be used attitudinally, so this makes sense) that the 
> speaker is picking up.

I used "a'adai" for "Note:", that is, to mark something that the reader should
pay attention to. Is that an appropriate use of "dai"?

cmeclax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7ITIlBETrxUjAxlERApMrAJ93F2dgJOzyUh1v4pC0xFgx7SO8HwCfQ6h+
m4dOwCwkEPqEEhJAhE3rtEk=
=Dr2u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

