From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jun 08 15:27:54 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 8 Jun 2001 22:27:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 23282 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 22:27:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Jun 2001 22:27:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta2 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 22:27:50 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (dynamic223.cl8.cais.net [205.177.20.223]) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f58MRn445865 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:27:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608182945.00d804d0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 18:33:48 -0400
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] dai was: rabbity sand-laugher
In-Reply-To: <01060816142502.05188@neofelis>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1> <69.166a5a35.28516924@aol.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010608150339.00da27b0@127.0.0.1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 04:12 PM 06/08/2001 -0400, cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri wrote:
>I used "a'adai" for "Note:", that is, to mark something that the reader should
>pay attention to. Is that an appropriate use of "dai"?

I think that ju'i[do'u] is more appropriate for "pay attention". I'm not 
sure that is what I always mean by "Note:" though. (The do'u usually will 
NOT be able to be elided).

lojbab


--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


