From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Jun 10 14:40:52 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 10 Jun 2001 21:40:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 49919 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2001 21:40:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Jun 2001 21:40:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2001 21:40:50 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A955EAA40078; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 17:40:37 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: "Jay Kominek" <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>, <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] zi'o and modals
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 17:40:34 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEMDCBAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0106101508120.3575-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu>
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>

> What is the difference, semantically, between
>mi klama bai zi'o
> and
> mi klama

mi klama is more succinct. There's no reason to say mi klama bai zi'o, when
mi klama is the same thing.

--la kreig.daniyl

'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci
.i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi'
-la djimis.BYFet

pgp public key ID: 0x5C3A1E74