Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:50:24 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote:

>
> la ritcrd cusku di'e
>
> >The attitudinal placement idea solves the same problem IMO opinion,
> >which is why I think it would be a fine way to go as well.
>
> Maybe it is, I haven't had time yet to look at how it would work
> for more than the couple of examples presented. Would it apply
> to {xu} as well, for example?

In usage, when people want to ask about the truth of a bridi, they put xu
in front. When they want to ask about the validity of a certain component
of the bridi, they put xu right after it. This sounds quite like the new
proposal to me.

-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!