From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Jun 10 19:13:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 11 Jun 2001 02:13:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 68837 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 02:13:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 11 Jun 2001 02:13:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta2 with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 02:13:14 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A93D472A0076; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:13:17 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:13:12 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" > xu do pu klama ti > Did you come here? > do pu klama ti xu > Did you come *here*? (as opposed to there) > I guess an issue remains: Have I asserted that you came somewhere at all, > or not? I know whether I came, why should you need to assert it? The English doesn't assert eaither way. Using that as a model isn't bias, it's pragmatism. The English doesn't assert not because that's not how English works, but because you don't have to tell me what I did unless I have amnesia. --la kreig.daniyl 'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet pgp public key ID: 0x5C3A1E74