Subject: Re: Emerald Tablets [was: RE: [lojban] Purpose of bridi

From: Rob Speer <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:30:09 -0400

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:52:51PM -0400, Craig wrote:
> Okay, the next sentence is confusing too. How do you say that because X is
> true, so is Y in a manner which asserts that X is true? I could just say X
> is true, if X then Y, but that seems rather contrived. Any ideas?

X is true implies that Y is true
Y is true asserts (implies) that X is true

This looks like a job for .ijo. Then you just have to state separately that
X is true, and it will be clear that Y is true as well.
-- 
Rob Speer