From pycyn@aol.com Mon Jun 11 15:05:15 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 11 Jun 2001 22:05:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 72054 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 22:04:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 11 Jun 2001 22:04:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 22:04:28 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id r.32.16405ef6 (4316) for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:04:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <32.16405ef6.28569a69@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:04:25 EDT
Subject: Fwd: Emerald Tablets [was: RE: [lojban] Purpose of bridi
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_boundary
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_alt_boundary"

--part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_alt_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 6/11/2001 4:03:58 PM Central Daylight Time, 
ragnarok@pobox.com writes:


> Okay, the next sentence is confusing too. How do you say that because X is
> true, so is Y in a manner which asserts that X is true? I could just say X
> is true, if X then Y, but that seems rather contrived. Any ideas?
> 

X ija'e Y


--part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_alt_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 6/11/2001 4:03:58 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>ragnarok@pobox.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Okay, the next sentence is confusing too. How do you say that because X is
<BR>true, so is Y in a manner which asserts that X is true? I could just say X
<BR>is true, if X then Y, but that seems rather contrived. Any ideas?
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>X ija'e Y
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_alt_boundary--

--part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <sentto-44114-7834-992292858-pycyn=aol.com@returns.onelist.com>
Received: from rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (rly-yc04.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.36]) by air-yc01.mail.aol.com (v78_r3.8) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:03:58 -0400
Received: from ej.egroups.com (230.yahoo.240.211.64.in-addr.arpa [64.211.240.230]) by rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (v78_r3.8) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:03:32 -0400
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-7834-992292858-pycyn=aol.com@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.55] by ej.egroups.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2001 20:54:19 -0000
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 11 Jun 2001 20:54:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 82082 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 20:52:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 11 Jun 2001 20:52:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 20:52:50 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AFA582E9006A; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:52:53 -0400
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFKENFCBAA.raganok@intrex.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <109.119187b.285679bd@aol.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:52:51 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Emerald Tablets [was: RE: [lojban] Purpose of bridi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Okay, the next sentence is confusing too. How do you say that because X is
true, so is Y in a manner which asserts that X is true? I could just say X
is true, if X then Y, but that seems rather contrived. Any ideas?

--la kreig.daniyl.

'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci
.i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi'
-la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji: 0x5C3A1E74


To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



--part1_32.16405ef6.28569a69_boundary--

