From pycyn@aol.com Mon Jun 11 15:05:18 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 11 Jun 2001 22:05:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 72257 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 22:04:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 11 Jun 2001 22:04:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 22:04:33 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id r.122.2adf1f (4316) for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:04:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <122.2adf1f.28569a6b@aol.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:04:27 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_122.2adf1f.28569a6b_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_122.2adf1f.28569a6b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/11/2001 4:05:02 PM Central Daylight Time, raganok@intrex.net writes: > No, pycyn, I don't mean differences in how good they are, but in how people > use the cmavo and the language as a whole. > Ah so!. Well, assuming that they speak grammatically the same langauge at the end, then it is unlikely that they will make other than statistically different patterns and those would probably not be S-W significant. It is grammar not word-choice or statistical patterns that should affect though processes, according to S-W. And it is though processes, not speech patterns that should be affected. --part1_122.2adf1f.28569a6b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/11/2001 4:05:02 PM Central Daylight Time,
raganok@intrex.net writes:


No, pycyn, I don't mean differences in how good they are, but in how people
use the cmavo and the language as a whole.


Ah so!.  Well, assuming that they speak grammatically the same langauge at
the end, then it is unlikely that they will make other than statistically
different patterns and those would probably not be S-W significant.  It is
grammar not word-choice or statistical patterns that should affect though
processes, according to S-W.  And it is though processes, not speech patterns
that should be affected. --part1_122.2adf1f.28569a6b_boundary--