From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Mon Jun 11 21:07:25 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 12 Jun 2001 04:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 97679 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 04:07:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Jun 2001 04:07:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta2 with SMTP; 12 Jun 2001 04:07:24 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f5C47Nh17956 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:07:23 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:07:23 -0600 (MDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] fractal In-Reply-To: <0106112351040M.01000@neofelis> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Jay Kominek On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Pierre Abbat wrote: > stidi zo frinyselcimde You're referring to objects whose Hausdorff dimension object exceeds their topological dimension. Thats pretty good, except that there are fractal things for which that isn't the case. It would certainly be the best word for constructs where Dh != Dt, however. paursmitai is another possiblity, x1 is a fractal of type x2 ci'urtolcne (for which i don't have a place structure) also comes to mind. - Jay Kominek