Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: zi'o and modals

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:43:52 -0400

Jorge Llambias wrote:

> la rab cusku di'e
> 
>>I now see that because zi'o actually eradicates the place it is not 
>>necessary
>>to switch it back, so it is simply a {zilvelbotpi}.
> 
> But if you don't switch it back, the place for the bottle is x3,
> isn't it? Wouldn't it have to be {terzilvelbotpi} to have it
> back in x1?

The convention (Chapter 7) is to use a number rafsi after the
zil. So to remove x4, use zilvonbotpi.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein