From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Jun 12 12:13:51 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 12 Jun 2001 19:13:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19081 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 19:10:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Jun 2001 19:10:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta2 with SMTP; 12 Jun 2001 19:10:58 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A94140770078; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:10:57 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] RE: zi'o and modals Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:10:46 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" So why don't we just change the meaning of 'botpi' so that it only has three places and none for a cap? Then we could have a gismu that means cap (If we don't already) and then say 'ti botpi .i ta cu [cap] ti' to say this is a bottle and that is its cap, and the botpi relationship would make sense. --la kreig.daniyl 'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji: 0x5C3A1E74