From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Jun 12 17:16:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 00:16:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 15604 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 23:41:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Jun 2001 23:41:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Jun 2001 23:41:58 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A8CA699400B0; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:42:02 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] RE: zi'o and modals Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:41:26 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" > Because an indented volume with a cap is not the same as an indented > volume without a cap. The one, the `cave with a door', is a `botpi'; > the other, the `natural cave', is a `kevna'. Then isn't the bottle by the side of the road a kevna, making this whole discussion of it and whether botpi fo noda is a botpi irrelevant since we can just call it a kevna? --la kreig.daniyl 'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji: 0x5C3A1E74