From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 12 17:43:04 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 00:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 39613 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 00:34:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 00:34:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 00:34:21 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159yBh-0004rU-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:07:09 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:07:09 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Message-ID: <20010612170709.Y14438@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Robin Lee Powell On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:42:25AM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > In any case, the main use of attitudinals, at least in my case, is > at the start of the sentence, so I would have less objections to > those more strange (to me) interpretations in other positions. Under my proposal, you'd have to put them after the brivla to get the affect you're used to. Actually, wait. That's stupid. I'm going to modify my proposal, but not in this mail. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/