From rob@twcny.rr.com Tue Jun 12 20:13:21 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 03:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11491 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 03:13:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 03:13:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout2-0.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.121) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 03:13:21 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout2-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with ESMTP id f5D3BsW23873 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:11:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.95.175.101]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:11:53 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15A11p-0001F8-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:09:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:09:09 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Message-ID: <20010612230909.A4744@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:06:48PM -0400, Craig wrote: > Here's my $.02. > Words in [square brackets] in the examples are for clarification and are not > part of the translation. > > MEEK LLAMA, OUI? > > A. Attitudinals attach to the word before them. > > B. An attitudinal expresses feeling about a bridi if it is attached to the > .i > .i .ui mi klama = I am happy that I come > > C. An attitudinal attached to .i does not change the assertive nature of its > bridi > .i .ui mi klama still asserts .i mi klama No matter how you phrase it, this doesn't work, because {xu} can go there and certainly does change the assertive nature. -- Rob Speer