Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals

From: Rob Speer <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:09:09 -0400

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:06:48PM -0400, Craig wrote:
> Here's my $.02.
> Words in [square brackets] in the examples are for clarification and are not
> part of the translation.
> 
> MEEK LLAMA, OUI?
> 
> A. Attitudinals attach to the word before them.
> 
> B. An attitudinal expresses feeling about a bridi if it is attached to the
> .i
> .i .ui mi klama = I am happy that I come
> 
> C. An attitudinal attached to .i does not change the assertive nature of its
> bridi
> .i .ui mi klama still asserts .i mi klama

No matter how you phrase it, this doesn't work, because {xu} can go there and
certainly does change the assertive nature.
-- 
Rob Speer