From xod@sixgirls.org Tue Jun 12 20:48:54 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 03:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16342 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 03:48:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 03:48:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 03:48:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5D3mqD21037 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:48:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:48:51 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals In-Reply-To: <20010612204535.L14438@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Oh. I misunderstood your proposal. OK, so it only fucks up .ui. 8) > And it's not equivalent to mine, because it doesn't allow: > > do .a'u klama le zarci > > to be > > I hope *you* go to the store. Sorry, this confuses me. It is a case where the idea really doesn't hold up without the 1st sumti. Therefore there is no difference as to whether or not the rest of the bridi (minus what it affected by the attitudinal) is still asserted. ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!