Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:48:51 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> Oh. I misunderstood your proposal. OK, so it only fucks up .ui. 8)
> And it's not equivalent to mine, because it doesn't allow:
>
> do .a'u klama le zarci
>
> to be
>
> I hope *you* go to the store.

Sorry, this confuses me. It is a case where the idea really doesn't hold
up without the 1st sumti. Therefore there is no difference as to whether
or not the rest of the bridi (minus what it affected by the attitudinal)
is still asserted.

-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!