From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 12 21:03:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 04:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 34658 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 03:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 03:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 03:59:33 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15A1oa-0006Ga-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:59:32 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:59:32 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Message-ID: <20010612205932.O14438@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Robin Lee Powell On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:48:51PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Oh. I misunderstood your proposal. OK, so it only fucks up .ui. 8) > > And it's not equivalent to mine, because it doesn't allow: > > > > do .a'u klama le zarci > > > > to be > > > > I hope *you* go to the store. > > Sorry, this confuses me. It is a case where the idea really doesn't > hold up without the 1st sumti. Therefore there is no difference as to > whether or not the rest of the bridi (minus what it affected by the > attitudinal) is still asserted. le remna klama .ei le zarci do .a'u klama le zarci _Someone_ has to go to the store. I hope *you* go to the store. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/