From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 12 21:04:55 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 04:04:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 27146 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 04:00:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 04:00:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 04:00:23 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15A1pP-0006HO-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:00:23 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:00:23 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Message-ID: <20010612210023.P14438@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Robin Lee Powell On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:50:27PM -0400, Craig wrote: > And if you were one of those many, many humans, that wouldn't be > physically painful? Not necessarily. Depends how we died. > Actually, Robin, I wasn't using the clinical meaning of the word, > which I know full well it is not. I was usig it to refer to the idea > of being hopeful for the death of many, many humans - possibly > including YOU! Just another of those things being better at the > unambiguous language I'm on this list to discuss would have made > clearer - if I had said it in lojban. there would have been no > question. I really wasn't sure if you were being facetious/imprecise, or if you were actually confused. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/