From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Jun 13 08:49:01 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 15:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 59684 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 15:35:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 15:35:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-1.cais.net) (205.252.14.71) by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 15:35:49 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (156.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.156]) by stmpy-1.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5DFZmg08671 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:35:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010613113555.00db2390@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:41:03 -0400 To: Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals In-Reply-To: References: <20010612162911.S14438@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 08:18 PM 06/12/2001 -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > > If you want total clarity, use the gismu equivalents of the > > attitudinals. > >Do they all have exact gismu equivalents? They all have exact brivla equivalents, but we haven't determined what they are %^) (This was intentional - I did not want attitudinals to be polluted by an attempt to match the semantic constraints that would inevitably come from equating them to particular brivla. The idea is to express the emotions and not analyze them. If you want to analyze emotions, you can use selbri.) I believe that the selbri equivalent of any attitudinal is "melu'ezo[UI]" lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org