From graywyvern@hotmail.com Wed Jun 13 16:11:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 8717 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.165) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:11:23 -0700 Received: from 65.67.96.113 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.67.96.113] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2001 23:11:23.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[29F5ED60:01C0F45E] From: "michael helsem" >From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" li'o > What >seems to be the case is that it is pragmatics and not grammar that >determines whether an attitudinal has propositional effect, with the >pragmatics being specific to the particular emotion and when/how it is >usually felt; I think we should leave it at that. > tugni _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com